Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 20.2 points higher (40.9 vs 20.7) but costs 4.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 20.7, and GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when 20.7 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 20.7 | −49.4% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 49.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $331.24 | −79.6% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 79.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.17s | 80.72s | +150.9% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 150.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 49.4% less intelligence, 79.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 150.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill