Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 7.4 points higher (40.9 vs 33.5) but costs 25× as much to run the benchmark ($3770 vs $154; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 33.5, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 33.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 33.5 | −18.1% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 18.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,769.96 | $153.58 | −95.9% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 95.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.40s | 6.61s | −79.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 79.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 18.1% less intelligence, 95.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill