Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs LongCat 2.0
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or LongCat 2.0 by LongCat? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 21.8 points higher (40.9 vs 19.1) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $545; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise LongCat 2.0.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 19.1 | −53.3% LongCat 2.0 is 53.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $544.74 | −66.4% LongCat 2.0 is 66.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 35.54s | +7.3% LongCat 2.0 is 7.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
LongCat 2.0 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 53.3% less intelligence, 66.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)LongCat 2.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill