Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 3.0 points higher (40.9 vs 37.9) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $110; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 37.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 37.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 37.9 | −7.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $109.55 | −93.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 93.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 49.53s | +49.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 49.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 7.3% less intelligence, 93.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill