Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 13.2% more intelligence, 87.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 46.3 | +13.2% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 13.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $206.66 | −87.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 87.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 48.29s | +45.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 45.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill