Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 1.3 points higher (40.9 vs 39.6) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $1385; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 39.6 | −3.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 3.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $1,385.40 | −14.6% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 14.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.91s | 22.03s | −28.7% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 28.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 3.2% less intelligence, 14.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill