Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)
Qwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 27.9% less intelligence, 40.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 29.5 | −27.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 27.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $2,277.12 | +40.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 40.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.91s | 16.67s | −46.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 46.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill