Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 28.5 points higher (52.6 vs 24.1) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $1524; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 24.1 | −54.2% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 54.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $1,524.02 | −36.7% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 36.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.20s | 115.75s | +83.1% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 83.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 54.2% less intelligence, 36.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 83.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill