Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 4.5 points higher (52.6 vs 48.1) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2101 vs $909; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6.1 Terra (Max).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 48.1 | −8.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 8.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,101.26 | $909.01 | −56.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 56.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 54.41s | 83.46s | +53.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 53.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 8.6% less intelligence, 56.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-6-1-terra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-6-1-terra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill