Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 6.8 points higher (52.6 vs 45.8) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $1537; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Astra (Low).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 45.8 | −12.9% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 12.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $1,536.78 | −36.2% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 36.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 65.70s | 11.63s | −82.3% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 82.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 12.9% less intelligence, 36.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)GPT-6 Astra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-6-astra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-6-astra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill