Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 14.5 points higher (52.6 vs 38.1) but costs 20× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $122; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 38.1, and GPT-6 Luna (Max) when 38.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 38.1 | −27.6% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 27.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $122.05 | −94.9% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 94.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.75s | 84.41s | +30.4% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 30.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 27.6% less intelligence, 94.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)GPT-6 Luna (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill