Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 27.3 points higher (52.6 vs 25.3) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $150; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 25.3 | −51.9% Hy3 is 51.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $149.61 | −93.8% Hy3 is 93.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 65.70s | 33.29s | −49.3% Hy3 is 49.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Hy3 vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 51.9% less intelligence, 93.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill