Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 43.3 points higher (52.6 vs 9.3) but costs 55× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $44.0; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 9.3 | −82.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 82.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $43.98 | −98.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 98.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.35s | 10.82s | −82.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 82.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 82.3% less intelligence, 98.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill