Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 30.8 points higher (52.6 vs 21.8) but costs 39× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $61.9; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 21.8 | −58.6% MiMo-V2.5 is 58.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $61.93 | −97.4% MiMo-V2.5 is 97.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.35s | 46.61s | −26.4% MiMo-V2.5 is 26.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 58.6% less intelligence, 97.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 26.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill