Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 9.9 points higher (52.6 vs 42.7) but costs 8.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $283; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 42.7, and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when 42.7 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 42.7 | −18.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 18.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $283.18 | −88.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 88.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.86s | 23.52s | −63.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 63.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 18.8% less intelligence, 88.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill