Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google or GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 24.8 points higher (54.2 vs 29.4) but costs 52× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $111; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when you need intelligence above 29.4, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 29.4 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 54.2 | 29.4 | −45.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 45.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,725.02 | $111.16 | −98.1% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 98.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.28s | 7.02s | −56.9% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 56.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low): 45.8% less intelligence, 98.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill