Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google or GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 23.7 points higher (54.2 vs 30.5) but costs 27× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $213; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when you need intelligence above 30.5, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 30.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 54.2 | 30.5 | −43.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 43.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,725.02 | $213.33 | −96.3% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 96.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.28s | 6.80s | −58.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 58.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low): 43.7% less intelligence, 96.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill