Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs Granite 4.2 8B
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google or Granite 4.2 8B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 49.1 points higher (54.2 vs 5.1) but costs 122× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $46.9; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when you need intelligence above 5.1, and Granite 4.2 8B when 5.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Granite 4.2 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 54.2 | 5.1 | −90.6% Granite 4.2 8B is 90.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,725.02 | $46.88 | −99.2% Granite 4.2 8B is 99.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.19s | 43.84s | +330.2% Granite 4.2 8B is 330.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.06 / $0.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Granite 4.2 8B vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low): 90.6% less intelligence, 99.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 330.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) scores 18.60 for $39.6.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)Granite 4.2 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/granite-4-2-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/granite-4-2-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill