Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-02.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 21.3 points higher (57.7 vs 36.4) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $1906; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when you need intelligence above 36.4, and Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when 36.4 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.7 | 36.4 | −36.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 36.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,903.03 | $1,905.84 | −67.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 67.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 58.48s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium): 36.9% less intelligence, 67.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill