Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-03.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium): 41.8% less intelligence, 7.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 491.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.7 | 33.6 | −41.8% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 41.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,903.03 | $6,353.83 | +7.6% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 7.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.62s | 68.67s | +491.0% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 491.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 57.70 for $5903.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill