Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 13.3 points higher (59.4 vs 46.1) but costs 21× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $389; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 46.1, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when 46.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 46.1 | −22.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 22.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $388.57 | −95.3% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 95.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 11.09s | −89.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 89.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 22.4% less intelligence, 95.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/gpt-6-1-sol-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/gpt-6-1-sol-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill