Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 2.5 points higher (59.4 vs 56.9) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $5661; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Astra (Max).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 56.9 | −4.2% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 4.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $5,661.18 | −31.3% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 31.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 241.04s | +135.2% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 135.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 4.2% less intelligence, 31.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 135.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)GPT-6 Astra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill