Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 29.5 points higher (59.4 vs 29.9) but costs 37× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $221; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 29.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 29.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 29.9 | −49.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 49.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $220.73 | −97.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 97.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 46.35s | −54.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 54.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 49.7% less intelligence, 97.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 54.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.10 for $190.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill