Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 40.7 points higher (59.4 vs 18.7) but costs 9.4× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $878; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 18.7, and MiniMax-M3 when 18.7 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 18.7 | −68.5% MiniMax-M3 is 68.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $878.03 | −89.3% MiniMax-M3 is 89.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 24.92s | −75.7% MiniMax-M3 is 75.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 68.5% less intelligence, 89.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.30 for $718.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill