Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 7.2 | −45.0% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 45.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.51s | 86.55s | +1470.8% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 1470.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.12 / $0.40 | $0.24 / $0.54 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill