Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 17.0 | +29.8% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 29.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.83s | 20.25s | +247.3% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 247.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.12 / $0.40 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill