Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.7 | 41.1 | +146.1% Ling 3.1 Flash is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,014.56 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.53s | 13.61s | −52.3% Ling 3.1 Flash is 52.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.34 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill