Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
MetaLlama 3.1 Instruct 70BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Llama 3.1 Instruct 70BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.76.6−60.5% Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B is 60.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.38s14.51s−48.9% Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B is 48.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.56 / $0.56
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itLlama 3.1 Instruct 70B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/llama-3-1-instruct-70b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/llama-3-1-instruct-70b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill