Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Llama 4 Scout

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Llama 4 Scout. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
MetaLlama 4 ScoutOff the frontier
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
$73.6
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Llama 4 ScoutDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.76.5−61.1% Llama 4 Scout is 61.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$73.56— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.38s4.99s−82.4% Llama 4 Scout is 82.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.34$0.18 / $0.66
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): what beats itLlama 4 Scout: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill