Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Ring-2.6-1T

Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Ring-2.6-1T. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
InclusionAIRing-2.6-1TOff the frontier
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
$576
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Ring-2.6-1TDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.916.6+19.4% Ring-2.6-1T is 19.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$575.60— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.63s24.04s+126.2% Ring-2.6-1T is 126.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.17 / $0.40$0.30 / $2.50
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning): what beats itRing-2.6-1T: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill