Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Mercury 2

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs Mercury 2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
InceptionMercury 2Off the frontier
Intelligence
10.80
Total cost
$105
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)Mercury 2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.510.8+44.0% Mercury 2 is 44.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$104.94— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.06s6.65s−39.9% Mercury 2 is 39.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.25 / $0.75
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itMercury 2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/mercury-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/mercury-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill