Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (max)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.20
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.2 (max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
52.60
Total cost
$904
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)GLM-5.2 (max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)12.252.6+331.1% GLM-5.2 (max) is 4.3× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$904.12— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)35.59s21.65s−39.2% GLM-5.2 (max) is 39.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$1.30 / $4.18
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.2 (max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill