Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 36.9 points higher (45.8 vs 8.9) but costs 105× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $14.7; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 45.8 | +414.6% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 5.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $1,536.78 | +10368.5% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 105× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 11.63s | −79.9% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 79.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 414.6% more intelligence, 10368.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)GPT-6 Astra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-6-astra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-6-astra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill