Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.5 (High) scores 29.9 points higher (38.8 vs 8.9) but costs 85× as much to run the benchmark ($1244 vs $14.7; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Grok 4.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 38.8 | +336.0% Grok 4.5 (High) is 4.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $1,243.85 | +8373.1% Grok 4.5 (High) is 85× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 18.82s | −67.4% Grok 4.5 (High) is 67.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.5 (High) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 336.0% more intelligence, 8373.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Grok 4.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/grok-4-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/grok-4-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill