Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Magistral Small 1.2
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Magistral Small 1.2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Magistral Small 1.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 8.6 | −3.4% Magistral Small 1.2 is 3.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 56.02s | 33.47s | −40.3% Magistral Small 1.2 is 40.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/magistral-small-2509 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/magistral-small-2509?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill