Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 37.4 points higher (46.3 vs 8.9) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $14.7; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 46.3 | +420.2% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $206.66 | +1307.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 14× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 48.29s | −16.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 16.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 420.2% more intelligence, 1307.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 16.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill