Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 29.5 points higher (38.4 vs 8.9) but costs 110× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $14.7; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 38.4 | +331.5% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 4.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $1,607.86 | +10852.7% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 110× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 27.12s | −53.0% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 53.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 331.5% more intelligence, 10852.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill