Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) scores 2.3 points higher (11.2 vs 8.9) but costs 22× as much to run the benchmark ($329 vs $14.7; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 11.2 | +25.8% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 25.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $328.86 | +2140.2% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 22× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.72s | 43.21s | −25.1% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 25.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.14 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 25.8% more intelligence, 2140.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/qwen3-5-9b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/qwen3-5-9b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill