GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Medium)

GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5 nano (Medium)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)GPT-5 nano (Medium)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.512.5−32.4% GPT-5 nano (Medium) is 32.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)79.40s40.57s−48.9% GPT-5 nano (Medium) is 48.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.55 / $2.20$0.05 / $0.40
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5 nano (Medium): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-5-nano-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/gpt-5-nano-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill