GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Phi-4Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.95.9−60.4% Phi-4 is 60.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.99s15.51s−22.4% Phi-4 is 22.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.57 / $2.20$0.13 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats itPhi-4: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/phi-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6/phi-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill