GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen2.5 MaxNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Qwen2.5 MaxDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.28.0−28.6% Qwen2.5 Max is 28.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.68sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Reasoning): what beats itQwen2.5 Max: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/qwen-2-5-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/qwen-2-5-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill