GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B

GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen2.5 Instruct 72BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Qwen2.5 Instruct 72BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.27.7−31.2% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 31.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.68s22.71s−30.5% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 30.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.47 / $0.49
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Reasoning): what beats itQwen2.5 Instruct 72B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/qwen2-5-72b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v-reasoning/qwen2-5-72b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill