GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 (Xhigh)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.5 (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
38.40
Total cost
$5294
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)GPT-5.5 (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.938.4+157.7% GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$5,294.36— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.65s44.76s+37.1% GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is 37.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$5.00 / $30.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.5 (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-5-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-5-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill