GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 16.1 points higher (42.2 vs 26.1) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $1487; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-5.1 (Reasoning).
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 42.2 | +61.7% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 61.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,486.78 | $1,630.69 | +9.7% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 9.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.24s | 11.28s | −82.2% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 82.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.28 / $4.07 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 61.7% more intelligence, 9.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill