GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) scores 16.8 points higher (26.1 vs 9.3) but costs 34× as much to run the benchmark ($1487 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 9.3 | −64.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 64.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,486.78 | $43.98 | −97.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 97.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.24s | 11.18s | −82.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 82.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.28 / $4.07 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 64.4% less intelligence, 97.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill