GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) scores 9.5 points higher (26.1 vs 16.6) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1487 vs $576; both premium class). Pick GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ring-2.6-1T.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 16.6 | −36.4% Ring-2.6-1T is 36.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,486.78 | $575.60 | −61.3% Ring-2.6-1T is 61.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 60.76s | 24.07s | −60.4% Ring-2.6-1T is 60.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.28 / $4.07 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Ring-2.6-1T vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 36.4% less intelligence, 61.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill