GLM-5.2 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)
GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 10.7% more intelligence, 84.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 183.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 37.3 | +10.7% GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is 10.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $319.93 | −84.7% GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is 84.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.10s | 85.38s | +183.7% GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is 183.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GLM-5.2 (Max)GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-5-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-5-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill