GLM-5.2 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (Max) scores 1.6 points higher (33.7 vs 32.1) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($2097 vs $108; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.2 (Max) when you need intelligence above 32.1, and GPT-5.6 Luna (High) when 32.1 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 32.1 | −4.7% GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is 4.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $108.15 | −94.8% GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is 94.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.14s | 12.33s | −56.2% GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is 56.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 4.7% less intelligence, 94.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
GLM-5.2 (Max)GPT-5.6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-5-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-5-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill