GLM-5.2 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (Max) scores 12.9 points higher (33.7 vs 20.8) but costs 8.2× as much to run the benchmark ($2097 vs $256; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.2 (Max) when you need intelligence above 20.8, and GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 20.8 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 20.8 | −38.3% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 38.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $255.77 | −87.8% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 87.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.50s | 5.10s | −82.1% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 82.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 38.3% less intelligence, 87.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GLM-5.2 (Max)GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill