GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) scores 10.5 points higher (44.2 vs 33.7) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2242 vs $2097; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-5.2 (Max).
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 44.2 | +31.2% Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is 31.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $2,241.91 | +6.9% Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is 6.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.14s | 37.48s | +33.2% Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is 33.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 31.2% more intelligence, 6.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GLM-5.2 (Max)Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/grok-4-6-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/grok-4-6-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill